The two texts in question here do not constitute a necessary contradiction. Even today it is often common practice (except in formal genealogical registers) to refer to only the surviving children. If one of Jesse's sons had died before being married, or without having had any children of his own, or without having ever done anything particularly noteworthy, it would not be unusual for his name to be omitted from the written record in 1 Chronicles. ![]() It simply names seven of his sons (including David) and two of his daughters. You will note that 1 Chronicles 2:13-15 does not state that Jesse only ever had seven sons. ![]() It is most likely that one of Jesse's sons died before making any significant impact during David's reign-thus being of no account to the chronicler. Which text is correct? How many sons did Jesse really have? And how can the Bible be trusted if you read one thing in one place and a totally contradictory statement in another place? Sensible Solutionīoth texts are no doubt correct. But 1 Chronicles 2:13-15 indicates that Jesse had only seven sons, and that David was the youngest. Alleged Bible Contradictionġ Samuel 16:10-11 clearly implies that Jesse, the father of Israel's King David, had at least eight sons, of which David was the eighth. ![]() David is anointed by Samuel, as seven brothers and his father watch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |